Instructional Design
Learning Strategy
Accessibility Integration
Training & Facilitation
Accessibility Audits
Accessibility is most effective when it is built into the design process, not applied as a final checklist. In every project, I approach accessibility as part of a connected system that includes structure, visual design, interaction patterns, and content clarity.
​
My audits reflect that same philosophy. I combine standards-based evaluation with user-centered analysis to identify structural, visual, and interaction barriers in digital learning and web content. Rather than simply flagging issues, I prioritize findings based on impact and provide clear, practical remediation guidance that teams can implement within their existing workflows.
​
The goal is not just compliance. It is sustainable, scalable accessibility that improves the experience for a wide range of learners.
​
This philosophy shapes how I approach every audit.
Whether reviewing early drafts or fully developed content, I examine how structure, design, and interaction work together to either support or limit access.
My Approach
Scope & Context Review
I begin by identifying the purpose of the content, target audience, and delivery environment. Understanding context ensures that findings are grounded in real use cases rather than isolated criteria.
Standards-Based Evaluation
Content is evaluated against relevant WCAG success criteria and accessibility best practices. This includes analysis of structure, heading hierarchy, color contrast, media alternatives, interaction patterns, and navigation logic.
Usability &
Interaction Analysis
Beyond technical compliance, I examine workflow barriers, cognitive load, clarity of instructions, and overall usability to ensure access is meaningful and practical.
Prioritization & Remediation Guidance
Findings are categorized by severity and impact. Each issue includes a clear explanation, reference to applicable standards, and specific recommendations for resolution.